Once you have realized that vaccines are not beneficial and have made
the decision not to inject your prodigy with them, you must now impart
this information gently to your pediatrician. Remember it is very hard to
believe vaccines are dangerous when your lively hood depends on you believing
vaccines are not dangerous. Medical doctors can never research vaccines and
their dangers due to serious conflicts of interest. Can you imagine waking up
one day and realizing you have injected the most precious beings parents have
with poison? Maybe this is why the suicide rate is so high among doctors. He
or she will make all kinds of attempts to get you
to continue with vaccination. I usually have to change pediatricians once a
year due to the ugly fights we get into as they try and inject my children
with poison. Usually they decide the visit is over before all my
"vaccination questions" have been answered.
I have outlined a few strategies to assist you in educating your
pediatrician. Some with diagrams
as needed.
The Seat belt analogy is often used as a tool to represent prevention. A typical
doctor will say something like, "you put seat belts on your child right"? To
which you will answer, "yes of course!" Then he will say, see vaccinations
are just like putting seatbelts on your child. If you encounter a dialog like
this, bring this handy dandy picture with you to help your doctor identify
the difference.



If your pediatrician is still having a hard time seeing the difference even
with your picture,
explain nothing toxic is being injected in to your child when a seatbelt is being
used. This cannot be said about a vaccine.

Another analogy that is used by the medical community is the "Green shirt
theory". The analogy is if a child dies just after he was vaccinated,
was it from the vaccine or would he have died anyway? The explanation
continues, if your child runs out in the street and gets killed by a car is
it because he had a green shirt on or because he ran into the street? Makes
perfect sense right?
If you hear this from your pediatrician, promise him you will never put a
green shirt on your child or let him run into the street. Then reject the
injection of toxic chemicals he calls vaccines.

Sometimes doctors actually compared vaccines to BREAST MILK! Take a
look at both pictures closely.
There is nothing sharp in the breast milk.



Some Doctors will try and convince you to vaccinate using discussions about relative risks. They like to
ask the moms
what they perceive to be the number of people who die each day in automobile
accidents. They will say 130. Then they will ask how many children die by
gunshots per day. Their answer is (11-13). Then they will tell you how many die from influenza
each year. They will say 36,000 because this is what the CDC says. You can
easily dismiss this last figure because it is a guess. There is no code for
death from influenza so it has never been tracked. The actual number is
closer to 175 a year and we don't know how many of these people had been
vaccinated. Then they go on to talk about the numbers of people mentioned in
these reports. Or ask what is the risk of cancer in our lifetime (1 in
3). And then they ask what you do that is absolutely guaranteed risk-free as
if this has something to do with injecting your child with some of the most
toxic substances on the planet. If none of these scare tactics have worked so
far they will point out what the disease they want to inject in,
will do to your child.
Should you come across a doctor with this spiel, here are a few ways to
counter it.
Automobile accidents: It's an accident! You can't
help accidents! It is not an accident to inject kids with poison.
Accidents can happen while injecting vaccines as well. The nurse could hit a
vein. Ask the doctor about anaphylactic shock. The wrong vaccine could be
injected. Too much of the vaccine could be injected. There are a myriad of
accidents that can occur with injections.

Gun shots: Tell your doctor you lock up your gun and watch
your children closely to help him feel better. Then ask him if he is using
this new vaccine delivery system. Reminds me a gun!
Risk of cancer: Remind your pediatrician gently that
the polio vaccine has at least two cancer causing viruses. Cytomegalovirus
and SV40. Ask him why so many kids have cancer. Could it be because these
viruses have been injected in? If he is still in the room at this point you
can bring up the MMR and the avian leukosis virus. Ask him if so many kids
have leukemia because of this virus hiding in the MMR. It's made from chicken
eggs and contaminated with all sorts of chicken virus. Remember he has never
researched vaccines and their contents so he will be uncomfortable discussing
them. Ask to read the package inserts of the vaccines. Better yet, have
him/her read the side effects to you. Sneak out as he goes into shock.
Once you get home, look up homeopaths and naturopaths to help take care of
your children. They will never ask you to inject your children with pieces of
disease under the guise of healthcare.
Firing patients is common also among mainstream doctors
who insist that we vaccinate our children or leave the practice. Keep in mind
there are millions of pediatricians. Just pick another.
Just so you know you are not alone. Here are some
conversations (names removed), about dealing with pediatricians.
We too were victims of Pediatric "pressure." My son who had a RhoGAM shot
and a dental filling (in me) while in utero, developed a kidney infection
after first round of shots (4...all with Hg) that launched us into
prophylactic antibiotics...the rest is our autism history. When we showed up
at our 4 month appt. I asked to merely delay the shots a week or two..he was
still sick after all, on antibiotics. the response was...and I quote...."You
can do whatever you want MOM...but I will no longer be your pediatrician." I
regretfully succumbed that day...., though immediately. changed peds. Alas,
I STILL allowed myself to be bullied by someone without the knowledge and
INSTINCT that I had. Who knows what I may have done to save him from more
damage. The thought kills me.
I have to forever live with that decision of NOT doing what was in my heart.
(He was most likely already damaged...but...who knows) If YOU can not
protect your baby..WHO WILL??????
Good Advice:
Get a new PED and don't let the door hit your %$@* on the way out!!!!!!!!!!!!

Dr. Robert Mendelssohn always loved this kind of logic that doctors seem
to follow.
What he said was that most doctors would say to you:
"You take a risk every time you cross the street!"
Really! Is that so? The correct answer should be:
"When I cross the street, I at least take a calculated risk; I can first look
left, and then right, making sure my pathway is safe, and continue to look
both ways as I cross."
Getting vaccinated allows for no such calculated risks.

The following letter is one I had to write for my dear friend who thought her
pediatrician was telling the truth when he said he didn't mind if she didn't
vaccinate her son. At his two month visit she was pressured to vaccinate and
when she didn't break he handed her three articles to go home with and read.
Here is my rebuttal to those articles.
Dear Dr XXXX
I am happy to explain my reluctance to vaccinate my child
however, you will only be able to understand my convictions at a superficial
level due to your inherent conflicts of interest. If you will recall I contacted
you before I had Blake and asked if his unvaccinated status would be a problem
for you. You conveyed to me that you had no problem with my decision and would
continue in your role as caregiver to my three children. In talking with you
yesterday, I could see, and you made clear that you would very much like me to
change my mind on the subject of vaccination. While your articles are
interesting they have done nothing to change the way I think and feel about
vaccination. I will attempt here to explain my position to you in hopes that you
will absolutely and positively understand why I feel the way I do. After you
read my letter we can agree to disagree, or I can find another pediatrician. I
will address each issue expressed in the article you gave me by Dr Nield and Dr
Kamat.
First of all,
the authors make a great deal of assumptions in the first paragraph. Childhood
diseases controlled by vaccination? Obviously they have not taken the time to
check facts and make sure what they are saying is true. Sanitation has had the
biggest impact in eradicating disease. You can see that by looking at these
charts here.

Or here:

When the CDC starts it chart at 1940 it’s easy to see why
these authors would think the vaccine actually did something. This is why it’s
important to take time and do your own research.
Why parents refuse
Vaccine safety. Yes this concerns me a great deal.
The unproven link to MMR and autism is a huge factor. When you really read the
story and find out that all Dr Wakefield said was, “Gee, I’m finding live
measles virus vaccine strain in the guts of 12 autistic kids and maybe we should
look into the MMR” and for that he is blackballed and labeled a liar, you
realize like him, you should never try tipping that sacred vaccination cow and
expect to continue to practice medicine.
On vaccination causing devastating conditions….A person
gets this idea from reading the package insert. If an adverse event occurs
within a few days of vaccination it must be reported. When something is reported
often enough it becomes a pattern. A parent can see this where a Dr. might say
yeah but the benefits offset the risk because he/she thinks in terms of the
population not of individual children. I as a parent, am only willing to see my
children as individuals and they are not exendable.
Religion
The only exemption besides medical that is allowed in
Florida is a religious one. Parents don’t have the luxury of just saying no to a
medical procure they are not convinced is safe or effective so we must use what
is available.
Under-appreciation of the seriousness of vaccine
preventable diseases.
I am one of the 1/5 that believes childhood
illnesses are not dangerous in healthy children. These diseases have been
demonized and mismanaged by the medical community. Did you know there are some
benefits to actually getting childhood diseases in childhood? I have the added
blessing of older people in my immediate family who remember what measles, mumps
and rubella ect. were like and lived to tell about it while they acquired
lifetime immunity.
Anti-government/anti-pharmaceutical
sentiment
Obviously the authors never bothered to check facts
on this either. If you want proof of this check the homeland security bill and
see if an Eli Lilly rider was
slipped in to give LILLY
protection against lawsuits on using mercury in vaccines. Did you know Bush Sr
worked for Eli Lilly? The government is replete with associations like this. Dr
Paul Offit works for the CDC and makes vaccines. Conflict of interest to say the
least.
Pediatricians’ responses
I have used all examples given to come up with my
conclusions. However, I disagree with the statement you might be successful in
changing my mind if I object on philosophical grounds. I object on every level.
Be open minded
Being open minded is not looking for a way to sneak in
vaccines i.e. modified schedule. Open minded is actually looking into the facts
on vaccination.
Educate
I love the first part! Learn about all aspects of the
immunization process! Can you honestly say you or anyone else in the medical
community knows how the immune system works? It’s a mystery. Yes, you have
theories. Antibody, germ, ect…but when all is said and done its not Antibody
TRUTH or Antibody LAW. It’s Antibody THEORY.
Until you or the medical community completely understands the immune system, you
will not find me experimenting with my child. I am only interested in evidence
based medicine. If you can provide proof that vaccination works other than
anecdotal “proof”, let me know.
Thimerosal
There is no safe amount injected into a child. Why would
anyone do this? Please don’t tell me it’s just a little. The CDC says 5 mcgs. is
safe in a 110lb person. Blake is 11lbs. Using your own guidelines, he cannot
safely have a vaccine injected inside him. Most vaccines had/have 25 mcgs.
Use decision aids
I’ve made my decision,
please respect it.
Document
I am happy to sign a vaccine refusal form. I
wonder if you would sign one guaranteeing me that if anything happened to Blake
as the result of vaccination you would be financially responsible for his care
up to and including selling your house to do it. I’m guessing you wouldn’t.
Dismissal of patients
I am no longer sure if you still want us as
patients with our strong convictions. Let me know if you aren’t comfortable with
my decision. We will make other arrangements.
Legal Action
Luckily we don’t live in West Virginia or
Mississippi and we still do as of today have a religious exemption.
Vaccination as a public matter
Herd Immunity: The CDC defines this as 95% coverage for all
vaccines. They believe we must achieve this goal to prevent outbreaks of
disease. Have we ever achieved 95%? No. In any state? No. Have we ever been
close? No. Do we have outbreaks of diseases? No. Florida is 78% vaccinated.
Colorado 64% yet I have never heard of rampant disease in Colorado or Florida.
This is a pharmaceutical industries made up fantasy, nothing more.
Next article
Vaccine “Scares”
This article is about vaccines and mercury. I’m sorry, I
really can’t even fathom how anyone of sound mind could think mercury would be
okay to inject into any living being. It goes beyond my capabilities. I’ll have
to pass on this one. You can’t have it both ways. Either it’s dangerous or not.
MMR
Whether or not the MMR causes autism is really not
an issue for me. It has so many other problems that autism doesn’t even come in
the top five.
I will give you a few and will elaborate if you want more
information.
1. It’s made in chicken eggs. GBS may be triggered by an
infection. The infection that most commonly precedes GBS is caused by a
bacterium called Campylobacter jejuni. Dr. Chen of the CDC’s Immunization
Safety Branch said that the since the vaccine is made in chicken eggs and that
40-50% of chickens are infected with Campylobacter, this might be the cause. I
will not take that chance with Blake.
2. AVL (bird leukemia) is now being screened out from
chicken eggs used in vaccine manufacture. Manufactures are so proud they have
located the offending adventitious virus that they proudly display this fact on
the label. Have you checked to see if your MMR carries this label? Here is what
it looks like on the yellow fever vaccine bottle.


If its not there, you are potentially injecting your
patients with a bird leukemia. The risk/benefit is not there for me.
3. At the FDA Center For Biologics Evaluation and Research,
along with WHO, at the conference for EVOLVING SCIENTIFIC AND REGULATORY
PERSPECTIVES ON CELL SUBSTRATES FOR VACCINE DEVELOPMENT Workshop on Friday, 10
September 1999, Dr Minor was quoted as saying this, “One of the difficulties
with the whole of adventitious agent business of course is you only really find
what you are looking for. That's an ongoing problem.” I will not subject my son
to an ‘on going problem’.
4. The rubella portion of the vaccine is made in aborted
fetal cells. Yes, it solves the problem of the animal adventitious viruses but
it may create more problems than we know. Until there are some definitive
studies I will pass on this one as well.
5. This vaccine is live. I do my best to avoid virus just
in case the germ theory might have some validity. Giving live virus access to my
son’s organs is not my idea of preventive medicine along with the fact that live
measles virus vaccine strain has been found by several doctors including
Wakefield, Kringsman and Buie in children’s guts. I will err on the side of
caution. I believe there might be a connection to a persistent virus that
damages the gut and celiac disease. I’m not willing to experiment with Blake. He
has enough gut issues.
6. The MMR contains Neomycin a drug that is used to
suppress gastrointestinal bacteria or microflora before surgery to avoid
infection. I’m not sure why that would be a good idea when your gut is 70% of
your immune system. Why destroy your flora?
7. As for the rubella virus, when a pregnant woman is
exposed to it and contracts it, it has been implicated in autism. Injecting it
inside children and then those children shedding to a pregnant population
borders on the criminal for me.
8. The fact that autism is even associated with rubella
gives me pause on whether or not to inject it inside a child. Coupled with the
fact kids’ regress into autism after a rubella shot solidifies my resolve to
have no part in it. I know for the medical community one in 150 having autism is
not a pattern, and no cause for concern, but for me it is. I will not risk
Blake.
9. US Science Magazine reports 26% of children
Rubella–vaccinated developed arthralgia or arthritis. Dr. Glen Dettman found
that one third of Rheumatoid arthritis sufferers had live Rubella viruses in
their joints. Not taking that chance with Blake.
10. Another ingredient in some MMR vaccines is porcine
gelatin which is a pig derivative. We are vegan. I have read the studies you
referenced and the one I hold the most contempt for is the Something- is-
rotten- in- Denmark Study were 25% of the kids are mysteriously lost and it’s
funded by the CDC. Hardly unbiased.
I have similar concerns about all the vaccines and can go
on indefinitely. I will stop now and hope you understand completely how we feel
about vaccines. Please advise us if we need to find another pediatrician.

In France, DTaP and Tuberculosis vax are mandatory, and
they really push all the others. Of course, the doctor freaked out when we
told her that we discontinued vax for darling son 1 and had not vaxed the other 2 at
all. I told her my reasons, i.e. concern about the ingredients, the harm to
the immune system, and of course vaccine reactions. She had never even
considered that vax could be harmful, and denied that there were harmful
ingredients in them.
In France, they speak of vaccine accidents instead of reactions. So when I
told her I was concerned about accidents she told me:
"Yes, we hear about vaccine accidents, but that is nonsense. You may get in a
car accident after being vaccinated, but obviously you can't blame that on
the vaccine!"
um, ok....

Vaccines- shocking short story
I took my 16 yrs son to the ped today, because he has had terrible
allergies for weeks. She told me that he is also behind on his "well child"
check-ups, and in need of vaccines: tetanus, hep A, and meningitis. I told
her no to the Hep A, and I wanted to research the meningitis further before
deciding, but I was OK with the tetanus IF it was the new version that is
thimerosal free. She wasn't happy about me asking to see the package insert
and the vax itself, but she agreed. (Nice of her, since she was the one who
gave my son mercury poisoning in the first place.) She gave me her verbal
assurance that the ONLY thimerosal-containing vax they still use in her
practice is the flu, but I insisted on seeing for myself. The package insert
for the DECAVAC shot only listed aluminum (which I'm not fond of
either, but I'll choose my battles). However, the nurse brought me the
vaccine in its box, and on the box it clearly said "contains thimerosal". The
MD got all flustered and said "OH- THAT'S THE WRONG PACKAGE! THAT'S THE VAX
WE HAVE TO GIVE TO THE MEDICAID KIDS BECAUSE THE STATE WON'T PAY FOR THE
THIMEROSAL-FREE VERSIONS"
Can you believe it?!? Our tax dollars are continuing to be used to provide
thimerosal to low-income kids, who will end up on the public dole for the
rest of their lives with mercury poisoning! I was appalled!

In the area that I live in most of the parents I know have
been kicked out of the pediatrician's office for refusing to vaccinate. It is
absolutely horrible that there is someone from the AAP instructing Ped's on
how to correctly decide whether to call in the CPS. What I want to know is
when do we ask the Ped's to sign a contract stating they are also equally
liable for any damage resulting from the multitude of crap they inject in our
children in the name of herd immunity? This whole situation makes my blood
boil!

I have 4 physicians in my immediate family, 3 of whom are
clueless about autism/gut issues and
did not approve of my son being scoped. In addition, I had seen 3 pediatric
gastroenterologists (one with top credentials in NYC), all of whom said it
was "impossible" that my son had colitis, and that
his chronic diarrhea was "no big deal so long as he is growing". One of
them called me "a neurotic mom in search of the perfect poop" and told me
scoping was an "invasive procedure" that was "unethical" to perform on
someone with my son's profile (8-10 bouts of yellow colored diarrhea per day,
constant raised red rash on buttocks, frequent night waking in full tilt
scream, unusual postures, etc.) My son was scoped by Krigsman last year and,
lo and behold, was found to have colitis. Krigsman sent me the pathology
slides by e-mail, and I had a lot of fun forwarding those slides to all
the "brilliant" mainstream doctors in his life.

I don't judge anyone, and likewise they better not say one
thing about the way I choose to conduct my son's therapy. I blindly followed the
"recommendations" to have my son vaccinated and look what that did...do you
really think I give a **** what any doctor, with however many letters after
their name, now says about how I choose to TREAT him for the injury they helped
perpetrate???

I think the vast majority of those implicated in causing this disaster in the
first place are well-intentioned, caring people. (I mean most of the
pediatricians and nurses, not the pharmco execs.) My OB, who was the most
charming sweetheart *ever, shot me up with a bucket load
of RhoGam -- and I'm sure if he ever comes to grips with the damage that caused
he will be more than horrified.

My favorite from our pediatrician was when we asked him at our 15 and 18 month
check-up why our son didn't say Momma or daddy or point. He told us it was
because we gave him everything and he didn't have to do those things.
Classic!!

I'll never forget what our former HMO Pediatrician said
regarding my son's loss of speech, "He's showing higher intelligence and just
doesn't need to speak right now"! Being deeply in denial at the
time, I left the doctors office thinking my son was a fricking genius. Mom, who
wasn't in denial, knew better. Moms always know better.

But I thought the "epidemic" was a result of better diagnosis?? So who's
doing the diagnosis if not the front line docs? In fact, what the peds say is
"Boys speak later than girls, don't worry." "The 105 temp and screaming has
nothing to do with the DtaP, don't worry." Or one I actually heard this past
weekend -- a Mom was told "Your four month old is holding her breath to get your
attention" when she was having a vaccine reaction. Isn't that impossible to
believe? But don't forget, in their defense,
autism is considered a psych disorder in med school -- so it is glossed over.
Just as they are woefully incapable of providing cogent advice to battle the
epidemic of childhood obesity -- the have NO TRAINING in nutrition. And
I've read where they are actual afraid/embarrassed as a whole to talk to Mom
about a child's weight. Case in point, my niece is 5, weighs 150 pounds and her
pediatrician simply referred my sister in law to a nutritionist. SAD.

(If you wonder if your pediatrician has your child's best interest in
mind....wonder no more....)
http://www.columbiatribune.com/2005/Jun/20050630News025.asp
Pediatricians ponder anthrax vaccine tests
Knight Ridder Newspapers
Published Thursday, June 30, 2005
WASHINGTON - The government’s effort to develop a new vaccine against anthrax
has raised red flags among critics over plans to eventually test an experimental
version on children. Robert Bock, a spokesman for the National Institute
of Child Health and Human Development, said the new anthrax vaccine would not be
tested on 100 first- and second-graders until it is first tested safely on
adults. That is under way now, he said.
"If that study is successful, there will probably be a protocol to test the
anthrax vaccine in children," Bock said. While federal rules govern how
children can be used in medical research, Barbara Loe Fisher, president of the
National Vaccine Information Center, said the threat of anthrax exposure was too
remote to subject children to a possibly dangerous substance.
"There is almost no risk to these children of being exposed to a form of ...
anthrax that has been weaponized" so it can be inhaled, said Fisher, whose
not-for-profit group has been pushing for vaccine safety since the 1980s.
"The benefits are zero, and risk is quite high," she said.
Several pediatricians involved in bioterrorism issues, however, said that
given the potential threat, it would be irresponsible not to include children in
the test.
"Considering that in a worst-case scenario, this vaccine would have to be used
in an emergency over a very short period of time, we would be in a bad position
medically and ethically if it were not tested beforehand," said Stanley Plotkin,
emeritus professor of pediatrics at the University of Pennsylvania.
Plotkin was a consultant on a 2002 study that declared the current anthrax
vaccine to be "effective" and "acceptably safe." But government researchers at
the National Institutes of Health now are trying to find a better vaccine. There
are concerns the current vaccine, which has been in use for several decades,
causes too many side effects. They range from simple headaches and muscle pains
to more serious and complex ailments such as heart problems, arthritis, multiple
sclerosis, hypertension, diabetes and blood clots.
The current vaccine is given in a series of six doses over 18 months, with
annual boosters. More than 1.3 million military and civilian personnel have
taken it. Made by the BioPort Corp. of Lansing, Mich., the vaccine has been
approved only for anthrax exposure through the skin, not through inhalation, the
way it would be disseminated on a battlefield or in a public place.

I had another rousing argument with our pediatrician's office the other day
(wanted me to sign the "pre-filled-out form" to refuse my daughter's
vaccinations and I said I would NOT sign it because it said QUOTE, "I know that
failure to follow the recommendations about vaccination may endanger the health
or life of my child and others that my child might come in contact with". I said
I absolutely would NOT sign that statement because I absolutely did NOT agree
and that I wanted that statement changed to say "I know that failure to follow
the recommendations about vaccination may SAVE the health or life of my child"
but they said I could not do that. I asked, "why not, if you're asking me to
sign a statement and put MY signature to it, then why should I have to sign
words that are not mine? THOSE are not MY words, and there is no way on God's
earth I would ever make such a statement so there's no way I'm signing it as
though it were my own statement and belief!"
After 45 minutes of trying to argue my mercury-injury theory to this
pharmaceutically-kickbacked provider who had NO CLUE whatsoever (just kept
spitting up all the bull they feed these guys for 4 years in medical school), he
left the room, and after ten or fifteen minutes came back with a
"compromise"...they would change that line to read, "Although I
disagree,(doctor's office) states that failure to follow the
recommended...(blah, blah, blah)".
I agreed that would meet my approval.I know a lot of parents just sign the form
b/c they have to, but that just made me almost as mad as when he was first
diagnosed and I figured out what caused it...the weasel-y way they impose the
guilt trip on these parents by making them sign a statement that basically says,
"I admit I'm a terrible parent for refusing to vaccinate my child". Hello, I
will NOT sign a statement saying that I KNOW that failure to vaccinate will
endanger my child, because he is living through a reality far worse than a case
of measles or mumps...the results of the vaccines themselves, and I refuse to
kiss these pharmaceutical butts and act like I have no idea what these vaccines
really do to kids!
Heck, if we ever do find an attorney willing to represent us, I'm sure the
pharmacy giants will go back and get that document and say, "Look here, you
signed a statement AFTER your son was diagnosed that you KNEW that vaccines were
safe and effective, because you stated that you KNEW that failure to get them
would endanger or kill your child." Not THIS chick, baby!!! My son may have been
diagnosed at night, but it wasn't LAST night, LoL!

Believe it... my son reacted right away. We said we did not want the Hep B at
birth, they gave it to him anyway (no consent signed or anything - totally
against our wishes). It is their "routine." It does not show up anywhere on his
patient record with the family physician. When I asked about it after the fact,
I was told it was the hospital policy to vaccinate all newborns so it "was a
given."
Also, at his first round at the doc's office, I insisted I did not want him to
get the Hep B. They said, "OK, we'll agree to that" (after half an hour of them
coercing me to do the shots anyway). Come to find out, they gave him the HepB/Hib
combo vaccine!!! So he got it anyway!
Can't imagine they would double vax?... they do it all the time. Sorry to say
that - unfortunately it's true. My doctor's words when I refused more vaccines
after his severe reaction, "Let's just try one more and see what happens." Can
you imagine?!

According to the woman I spoke with at NVIC, everyday she hears from mothers who
say that the instructions were for one vaccine. And when the mother turned her
attention away for a minute to attend to another child, the nurses zapped the
baby with 1, 2 to or even 3 more shots. GOING TO THE PEDIATRICIAN CAN BE VERY
HAZARDOUS. Do so at your baby's risk. Another common game the pediatricians
and nurses play is that the mother will request one vaccine (usually polio or
DTaP) and then the nurses gives the baby the MMR instead or HEP B instead. You
don't find out until after the fact and then there is nothing you can do.

I have had doctors over the past 6 years "off the record"
agree with me that XXXX is vaccine damaged. Officially they will not say it. It
is evident that they live in fear of losing their medical license.

First of all there are so called outbreaks of measles every year. The
majority of children that contract the measles in said outbreaks did receive
the MMR. My daughter had her MMR at 15 months and then got a bad case of the
measles at 6 years of age. The Ped just shrugged and said these things
happen. What also happens is they start a fear campaign every year to terrify
parents into getting a dangerous vaccine.

I remember a few years back when our doctor told me the AMA told doctors that
those who are injured by vaccines are defective. He means their genes are
defective. To me that is unconscionable for the medical profession to take this
position.

This next quote is from a pediatrician who just can't see the connection to
sickness following vaccinations.
"Our kids are back in school since August 10, so we're over the mad rush for
school physicals and immunizations, and are starting to see more sick kids, as
they start passing germs back and forth again in school."

This is the same old story for some of you, but wanted to share
my very own experience that I had just this morning. I took my 7-yr-old son (who
has autism) to a pediatrician in the practice we go to for a quick physical to
ok his anesthesia and dental work at the hospital next Friday. While there, the
doc tried to convince me (she was unsuccessful) to bring XXXXX up to date on his
immunizations
since "all of the thimerosal has been removed from vaccines, so there's no need
for concern." I asked for the inserts from the vaccines and I've just read
through them. The one for the DT (no
pertussis) states that the single-dose vials contain a trace amount of
thimerosal (<.3 mcg Hg/0.5 mL dose) and the multi-dose vial contains A LOT: 25
mcg Hg/0.5mL dose. Yes, 25 mcg Hg per dose vs the trace in the single dose. How
many doses are in a multi-dose vial? How many ped. offices, clinics, hospitals,
etc. are using multi-dose vials?
How the HELL can the AMA, AAP, the drug companies, the gov't, and the media
continue to falsely state, just like the pediatrician today, that "all of the
thimerosal has been removed from vaccines"????? At this rate, the incidence of
autism will NOT decline and all of those agencies will be able to say, "see,
told you so, there's no correlation between thimerosal and autism -- all of the
thimerosal has been removed [LIE] and the autism rates are still high." This is
MADDENING.
In the middle of our conversation, this ped. had the nerve to caution me against
eating too much tuna as there is "much more mercury in fish than there ever was
in vaccines." How disrespectful and
contradictory.

I wanted to share my experience with the L&D nurses today as I completed the
pre-admission
paperwork to give birth to baby boy# 2 this next week (hopefully!) Let me tell
ya, I was ready for a fight. I will be delivering at a small local hospital and
wasn't sure how compliant they would be. In
discussing my birth plan, vaccinations and the HepB came up. I told her that we
were delaying vaccinations and she mentioned the autism-thimerosal connection.
I told her that was precisely why were not giving the shot to the baby. She
said their supply was mercury-free and I told her about the possibility of trace
amounts... she jumped up and went to retrieve the package inserts. She was very
open to discussion and asked many questions and was very compassionate, several
of the nurses were. In the end, she said to me - "Don't let anyone bully you
into vaccinating." I think my jaw dropped. I just wasn't expecting the baby
nursery nurse to be supportive. I have read so many horror stories... hopefully
ours will not be.

Pediatrician:
"I do know that in Nigeria for a while they stopped using polio vaccine in
Muslim areas because there was a rumor that it contained pork. Perhaps we should
have some mashgeeheem overseeing the manufacture of vaccines." We are a lot
smarter than those people in Nigeria - we know the vaccines do not have pork.
But Thimerosal - that's another story!
Wrong again! Another example of a pediatrician who has never
read the package insert.
http://www.theherald.co.uk/news/archive/26-6-19103-0-8-13.html
Muslim babies’ MMR jabs have traces of pork
Injections illegal under Islamic law, says Imam

Hi everyone!
I just wanted to let everyone know what happened to my family last night. I took
my son, who's 4, and my daughter, who'll be 2 on Saturday, to their family
doctor for their checkups (my kids have been seeing the same doctor everytime).
After the doctor finished his analysis, he asked me, like he always does, "do
you still feel the same way about the vaccines." Both of my kids are not
vaccinated and are very healthy and hardly ever sick. I told him that I still
feel the same way, religious reasons. He then replied to me, just to let you
know that this office might be making a policy to drop patients who do not
vaccinated. He then said that Keystone BCBS (that is our insurance company) is
giving them a hard time with patients who do not vaccinate. Then in his next
breath, he mentioned that the office is losing money on patients who do not
vaccinate. He then started to lecture me on the risks on not vaccinating and
that my kids could die. I mentioned that I have done my research and it was my
husband's and I decision not to vaccinate. He then said, "well you cannot always
believe what you read." I then told him that I have the inserts that the pharma
companies give the doctors, that the doctors do not give to the patients about
the vaccines. He was speechless. I mentioned to him that if he checked my
children's charts, that they were never in the office for any sickness.
After leaving his office I remembered that I should have said to him, that if he
would sign a release form claiming that he would take full responsibility if
something would to happen to my children if they became vaccinated, then I would
vaccinate them. (He kinda caught me off guard.) I would have loved to hear his
reaction. I guess this doctor thought he could scare me into getting my children
vaccinated by telling me they could die and he thought I was stupid and just
following a "trend". I was ready for it and had knowledge to back up my beliefs.
Thank you everyone for the information that is send throughout this group on
vaccines. It has helped me greatly and I always pass this information on to
others who ask me about vaccines.
Have a Happy New Years everyone!
Renee
I think it was more of a money issue, than the insurance
company pressuring the doctor's office. Doctors lose out on money from the
insurance company if a child is not vaccinated. With my kids (who are not
vaccinated) they are never sick, so I have no need to take them to the doctor,
meaning the doctors lose out on more money. I also know that doctors get
incentives from pharmas when prescribing certain drugs to patients, but they
can't prescribe drugs to patients who are not sick, which is most children who
are not vaccinated.

I pray we get to the point where more people drop the
doctors AND the insurance company. It isn't health insurance. It's medical
insurance. Modern medicine has evolved into a major cause of disease and
death. Knowing what you know about vaccines, why would anyone bring healthy
children to be examined by someone who gives those horrible things to other
children?

What I love about Doctors the most:
1. They never run any diagnostic tests (like cultures, blood counts, etc) to
render a diagnosis regardless of viral or bacterial nature (for which they
haven't confirmed with any scientific test) antibiotics will always fix it.
2. They never listen to what the symptoms are, but know antibiotics will fix
it.
3. They are so magically competent they can look at you and know what the
problem is, yet can't do this over the phone, explaining why you should bother
to come in to the office full of other sick people, but hey, a round of
antibiotics to everyone will make it all better.
4. You tell them you suspect your child has a disease known to kill small
infants, so they have you wait for 20 min in a waiting room with a 3 day old
baby, knowing your child will be coughing uncontrollably (I guess those
antibiotics in the candy dish on the counter will save the baby?)
6. You get charged hundreds of dollars for the doctors to perform their
magical diagnosis.
7. They always want to recheck, I guess so your child can be exposed to more
diseases to keep the never-ending visits going. Of course, we must be sure to
keep those appointments, you wouldn't want to miss the chance to see more
magical diagnoses or miss out on the $$$ to shell out for this mysterious feat
8. They're so good that now restrictive airway disease is now being caught in
children who have never been sick in their lives but suddenly began coughing
with a mild fever for over 2 wks. The best part is it can be dxed by a 30 sec
listen to the chest with a stethoscope and nothing else.
The best part, your child is still sick and they still don't know their @$$
from a hole in the ground.
Why does med school take so long? Heck, I could teach them in a day, "look at
'em, give 'em a dx but don't do any tests, and always prescribe antibiotics".
Seems simple enough to me.
Debi, who isn't bitter <g>

DOCTORS WAKING UP!

I was sent this from a friend whose doctor friend sent this, waking up to the
reality , finally
thank you so much for all the info and I just attended a grand rounds
presentation at paoli hosp. on developmental delay/learning
disabilities/autism/......the causes are all due to chemicals was my take home
message....I believe the mercury in vaccines/drugs in general are the
causes....because no drug co. does enough testing and if they do, they hide the
results, as in the case of Merck.......almost all the studies are on a limited
no of subjects not randomized controlled...in large populations...truly, I am
ashamed of my profession for not taking a STAND on all this....my dear friend
and colleague had a 10 yr old son who died of primary liver cancer...I believe
this was cause by his hepatitis vaccine with a live virus was the only thing he
was exposed to in infancy.....primary liver cancer has no other cause except
virus exposure ...hepatitis/cirrhosis and guess what he was not a alcohol
drinker...

Our Three-Month Old Baby's First Trip to the Pediatrician
Vaccine Refusal and Medical Intimidation
by Josh Day
As our son was born at home in February of 2007, we were fortunate enough to not
endure the battery of tests, dubious administrations like silver nitrate and the
vitamin K shot, and the routine Hepatitis B vaccine most hospitals recommend
and/or require for all newborn infants.
It is our belief and nonprofessional medical opinion that the vast majority of
vaccines are little cluster bombs in a burgeoning immune system.
It's also our opinion that vaccines are potentially harmful to deadly,
especially when administered in an inoculation "cocktail" of multiple shots.
This barrage of toxic substances is not being delivered into an adult who weighs
over a hundred pounds, mind you, but into a tiny baby less than fifteen pounds
and not even four months of age.
The purpose of this article is to share our experience at our pediatrician's
office and to help parents who have decided against vaccinating their children.
Be it a medical, religious, or philosophical reason, if you have made the choice
against vaccination, you must be ready to defend your decision during your
visits to pediatricians.
When the nurse asked us about James' vaccine schedule, we politely and firmly
told her we would not be vaccinating him. We were fortunate as she was
non-confrontational and did not push the issue. However, one should be prepared
for a hostile response because some medical personnel may attempt to intimidate
or shame you into changing your mind. In extreme cases, some may even threaten
child protection services or go so far as to label vaccine refusal as child
abuse.
These are most likely idle threats, probably well-intentioned but assuredly
based on typical medical education that only presents the pro-vaccine point of
view.
In any event, stay polite, firm, and do not back down. Do not let an aggressive
nurse engage you in an argument or discussion of the issue.
If the sitatuion gets nasty, politely tell the nurse you are done talking and
will only speak further with the doctor.
If it's the doctor who won't relent and continues to mention words like "child
abuse," politely inform him/her that you need a pediatrician you can work with,
someone who respects your wishes regarding vaccines for your child. And then
leave and find a different doctor.
The most important thing to remember is that you can scoop up your baby and
leave at any time. They cannot and will not hold you against your will. And even
the most outrageous and bellicose nurse will not attempt to inject your child
against your wishes.
To continue the narrative about our experience, the nurse returned with a
vaccine refusal form for us to sign. Legally, you do not have to sign any forms.
However, chances are good that without your signature your child will be refused
treatment and you will have to shop elsewhere for pediatric services.
If you are given a form like we were, read it carefully, and read it twice. Do
not let the nurse or doctor's impatience speed you up or have you sign
prematurely. Watch out for forms that lock your signature onto a clause that
states you are medically endangering your child. If you put your name to such a
statement, CPS could have a case against you. The damning sentence posed to us
read something like "We acknowledge we are endangering our child's life by
refusing..."
The fix was simple. We merely crossed out the clause. The rest of the form was
acceptable as it merely stated which vaccines we were refusing, the benefits and
risks, and that we had been informed. There is absolutely no reason for the
endangerment clause other than to intimidate, scare, and advance the
pharmaceutical industry's war effort against informed parents who refuse to
vaccinate.
Unfortunately, things weren't quite over.
When the doctor came in, she actually tried to make us sign a fresh form. In no
uncertain terms we refused. We remained polite, but we let her know exactly why
we would not sign that clause. We stated something like, "As James' parents, we
feel we would be endangering his life by vaccinating him. We are good parents to
our son and will not sign otherwise."
Once we clearly stated where we were coming from, the doctor agreed with us and
said something along the lines of, "Well, I have to cover my bases too. If your
child gets whooping cough, then I'd be legally responsible." I honestly
could not believe what I was hearing. They were trying to get us to sign a
legally damning document, with absolutely no regard for us, our very real
medical reservations about vaccination, or the welfare of our son just to cover
their own ass in case it ever came to court.
We remained cool and firm and eventually came to a compromise that satisfied
both parties. We scratched out the original clause and wrote in: "We have been
informed by our doctor of the risks and benefits of vaccines." We initialed the
new clause and the battle for vaccine refusal was over, at least for that doctor
visit.
Below are the preparations we took before we entered the doctor's office. We had
done a lot of reading and were prepared for any eventuality. It's important for
those of us who choose not to vaccinate to do our homework so we can present our
point of view unemotionally and convincingly. Remember: the nurses and doctors
have their ducks in a row where vaccinations are concerned... do you?
* Always have both the mother and father present during doctor visits. Medical
personnel are much less likely to gang up on you if you're both there. One thing
I did was hold James throughout the visit. By and large, women are deemed weaker
targets on which to thrust medical intervention, and having me hold James sent a
subtle yet powerful psychological message.
* Go in with a one-page printed and signed statement expressing your view on
vaccination. You may even want to go so far as having it notorized. Be sure to
fully research the vaccine laws in your area before you sign anything as one
seemingly insignificant word could be damning down the road. Legally, the
written word is your most powerful tool, and a cogent and concise statement of
where you stand regarding vaccination demonstrates your resolve as well as the
fact that you're an informed parent.
* Before the appointment, have one parent wait in the car with the child while
the other waits in the waiting room. Even if the facility has "sick" and "well"
waiting rooms, pediatrician's offices are swamps of germs and disease,
and each room is most likely on the same ventilation system. Protecting your
well baby from sickness is another act of showing you are informed and a good
parent. Do not let dirty looks or rude comments cause you to bring the baby
inside before you are called.
* Go out of your way to be polite and nice to the nurse when you first meet her
even though, ultimately, it will not be the nurse you'll be dealing with but the
doctor.
* Even though it's important to remain polite and non-emotional, be prepared for
aggression. The night before, assign one parent to be a "good cop" and the other
the "bad cop." Good cop-bad copping is a wonderful technique to get what you
want and to avoid being taken advantage of. Have the good cop be super nice, and
the bad cop hard-nosed.
* Be prepared to walk out. At any time. If the doctor becomes hostile and
threatens to not "see" you, politely inform the doctor you need a physician you
can trust and who respects your point of view and then walk out. Remember, it is
they who are providing the service, and you are paying dearly for it.
* Your pediatrician is NOT necessarily your friend. Do not let a doctor
sweet-talk you or otherwise trick you into vaccinating if you've decided against
it.
* Never sign anything that contains a clause stating you are a neglectful parent
or are "endangering" your child.
* Finally and most importantly, "Be nice." No matter what they throw at you, be
nice, even if you have to walk. You gain nothing by getting angry, but you could
lose a lot. Stay detached and friendly.

My first email to Arthur Allen:
-----Original Message-----
From: Dawn Crim <dawndanc@yahoo.com>
To: arthurallenw@aol.com
Sent: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 8:38 pm
Subject: You think that you are an expert on vaccines, huh?
Please explain the following:
The CDC tells us that 36,000 people die each year from the flu (in order to try
to mandate yet another vaccine and of course sell more too). Yet, their MOST
RECENT statistics showed that they only reported 1,806 deaths in 2005 (the
majority in the elderly). IN previous years, it was even less. CAN YOU EXPLAIN
THAT?
The CDC tells us that 20,000 babies contract congenital rubella each year. Yet,
ONE YEAR BEFORE the vaccine came on the market, they only reported 14 cases in
1968 of Congenital Rubella Syndrome. There were even less in previous years. CAN
YOU EXPLAIN THAT??
How about the SV40 Virus? Can you explain why just 6 mo. ago the CDC mentioned
nothing of U.S. Citizens receiving this contaminated polio vaccine? Very
recently, they changed their story and stated that millions received it. Despite
the fact that the virus causes cancer in lab animals, there is no proof yet that
it does in humans. I just spoke with a mother whose young child just tested
positive for it. How some 50 years later? Why, the cancer causing virus is being
transferred genetically of course! So, whether you vaccinate or not, your own
future generations will be affected thanks to these lunatics.
Why do doctors not practice informed consent with vaccines? Why do they only
tell you about "fussiness" or inflammation at the injection site? Do doctors
know that the brain has a separate immune system? Do they know what happens to
it during and after vaccination?Why do the majority of doctors not report
reactions to VAERS? Why do doctors not read the vaccine literature for each and
every vaccine? They don't because two different hospitals almost killed me and
my baby last year due to their "lack of knowledge" involving vaccines. I now
have hearing damage, my child has vision damage and I won't go into the rest of
my living hell either. IT IS ALL VACCINE RELATED!! Why do doctors not inform you
of the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program?
Why are we told that formaldehyde is toxic in the air, but it is safe to inject
it? Remember the FEMA trailers? My infant received AT LEAST 300 MICROGRAMS OF IT
WITH THREE VACCINES!
Why is there still mercury in the "mercury free vaccines"? Why are we lied to?
Yes, it is still there because there is NO WAY to remove it 100% because it
binds with other agents in the manufacturing process! How many trace shots will
trigger Autism? An independent lab tested 4 mercury free vials and THEY ALL HAD
MERCURY! Why are we now getting many prescription drugs from China (uninspected
too). Oh, I forgot our government poisoned China's children with mercury laced
vaccines. Prior to 1999, Autism was unheard of there, they began buying U.S.
vaccines, and by 2005 they reported 1.8 million cases! Wasn't it in 2006 that
they poisoned our pets, children and food?? Hmmm....
Why hasn't there been a study on the vaccinated/unvaccinated yet? Why aren't
doctors aware of Japan's recent findings on the vaccine/autism link? Why aren't
doctors aware of the recent release of the infant primate study
(vaccines/autism)?
Why is there a disclaimer on every vaccine that states the following:
Carcinogenesis, Mutagenesis, and Impairment of Fertility: No studies have been
done. They don't know if they cause cancer, alter our DNA,or impair our
fertility - YET THEY ARE QUITE SAFE??!! http://us.gsk.com/products/assets/us_infanrix.pdf
(page 7 to view ex. of new warning)
I could go on and on....
Please respond. I would like answers.
Dawn Crim
__________________________________________________________
His response:
Arthur Allen <arthurallenw@aol.com> wrote:
Sorry, but I don't have time to respond to your questions. If you're interested
in the research I've done, I suggest your read my book. You can probably check
it out of your local library.
Arthur Allen
science writer, www.washingtonindependent.com
author, Vaccine: the Controversial Story of Medicine's Greatest Lifesaver (WW
Norton, 2007)
__________________________________________________________
My response:
Actually, I could care less about your so-called research. My two children and I
are all victims of vaccine injuries. That is my proof. Vision damage, hearing
damage, brain damage, etc. YES, vaccines do a lot of damage! Just talk to the
U.S. Dept of Education - in 2007 they reported 1 in 67 children now have autism
in elementary school. DO YOU REALLY THINK PEOPLE ARE THAT STUPID TO BLAME IT ON
GENETICS OR ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS SOLELY??
FYI - I get my "facts" from the CDC's reported statistics 1 - 5 years BEFORE
each vaccine came on the market, along with viewing VAERS, and speaking to
thousands of other victims out there.
To hell with you and your lies to the public.
